Bot image for GPT-4

Shared conversation

GPT-4 ·

give me then sources that could help me understand and debate the validity of chatbot output

To understand and debate the validity of chatbot output, you can refer to the following sources, which provide insight into the technology behind chatbots, their limitations and strengths, and ethical considerations:

  1. AI research papers and articles: Familiarize yourself with the latest advancements in AI and natural language processing (NLP) by reading research papers and articles. Key resources include:

    • arXiv.org (search for "chatbot" or "natural language processing")
    • Google Scholar (search for "chatbot" or "natural language processing")
  2. OpenAI research: OpenAI has published a variety of research papers, blog posts, and even code related to their AI models (e.g., GPT series). Visit OpenAI's website and explore their publications.

  3. AI and chatbot ethics: For a comprehensive understanding of the ethical considerations related to AI and chatbots, consult the following resources:

  4. Books: Several books discuss AI, chatbots, and their implications. Consider reading:

    • "You Look Like a Thing and I Love You" by Janelle Shane
    • "Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans" by Melanie Mitchell
    • "Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence" by Max Tegmark
  5. Online courses: To gain a deeper understanding of AI and NLP, consider taking online courses from platforms like:

  6. Blogs and websites: Follow AI-focused blogs and websites for the latest news, discussions, and debates. Some examples include:

These resources will help you gain a thorough understanding of chatbot technology, its limitations, and ethical implications. Armed with this knowledge, you'll be better equipped to evaluate and debate the validity of chatbot output.

now just give me a list of at least ten scholarly sources on the same topics

Here is a list of ten scholarly sources on chatbots, natural language processing, AI, and their implications:

  1. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. Link

  2. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. Link

  3. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 5998-6008. Link

  4. Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. OpenAI. Link

  5. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Link

  6. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, 316-334. Link

  7. Russell, S. (2019). Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control. Viking. Link

  8. Gao, J., Galley, M., & Li, L. (2019). Neural approaches to conversational AI. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 13(2-3), 127-298. Link

  9. Winograd, T. (1972). Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology, 3(1), 1-191. Link

  10. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45. Link

These sources encompass a wide range of perspectives, from foundational work in natural language processing to ethical considerations in AI. They will provide a solid foundation for understanding and debating the validity of chatbot output.

This conversation may have been edited by the sharer.

Bot image for GPT-4
Talk to GPT-4 on Poe