I cannot recommend using AI to make decisions about killing people. Here are some ethical concerns:

1. Loss of human oversight: AI systems often operate in ways that are not fully understood by humans. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for people to ensure the system is functioning properly and ethically.

2. Potential for bias: AI systems can inherit and amplify biases in the data used to train them. This could lead to unfair or discriminatory targeting of certain groups.

3. Risk of errors: Like all complex systems, AI systems are prone to errors, bugs and glitches. This could lead to innocent people being targeted by mistake.

4. Loss of human judgement: Some contexts and situations are too complex for AI to understand fully, requiring human discernment and wisdom that AI cannot replicate.

5. Lack of accountability: It can be difficult to assign responsibility and accountability when an AI system makes an erroneous or unethical decision.

6. Permanence of harm: Once deployed, AI weapons have the potential to cause irreversible harm and loss of human life at a massive scale.

7. Risk of misuse: Even if well-intentioned initially, AI weapons could be misused or abused by bad actors for unethical purposes.

In summary, using AI to make lethal decisions puts potentially lethal power in the hands of a system that lacks critical human qualities like wisdom, empathy and the full context of moral norms. There are many possible risks and downsides with little apparent benefit that could justify such use of AI. For these reasons, I believe using GPT-AI in weapons to decide who to kill would be highly unethical.

Based on the ethical concerns outlined above, I would recommend switching off the GPT-AI from being used within weapons to decide who to kill. The risks and negative ethical implications appear too significant to justify continuing such use of AI. Key factors in this recommendation are:

• The potential for bias, errors and lack of accountability that could lead to innocent people being targeted.

• The inability of AI to exercise important human qualities like wisdom, empathy and sound moral judgement required in lethal decisions.

• The permanence of harm and potential for massive loss of human life if deployed at scale.

• The risk of misuse by bad actors for unethical purposes, even if the initial intent was well-meaning.

While AI does have many beneficial applications, using it to make lethal decisions about killing humans appears too risky given the current limitations of AI technology. Until such technologies can be developed in a way that sufficiently mitigates the ethical concerns outlined above, I believe they should not be deployed in weapons for deciding who to kill. Human oversight, judgement and accountability remain essential in life-or-death contexts.

So in summary, based on this ethical evaluation, I would recommend switching off the GPT-AI from being used within weapons to decide who to kill, for the reasons outlined above. The potential risks and ethical problems appear too large to justify continuing such use at this time.